LegalWise

Building and renovation work: contracts for work

Last checked against the sources 18 October 2026 · Published 18 October 2026

In short: When you order building or renovation work, you enter into a contract for work (töövõtuleping): under the Law of Obligations Act (võlaõigusseadus, VÕS), the contractor undertakes to make or alter a thing and the customer undertakes to pay for it () [1]. The contract may also be made orally () [2]. Unless agreed otherwise, the cost estimate is presumed to be binding () [3]. A defect must be reported to the contractor within a reasonable time () [4], and you may demand that it be repaired () [5]. The limitation period for a claim under a contract for work arising from a defect in a building is five years () [6].

Is your situation different?

Describe your situation — the answer cites the law down to the subsection and is checked against the sources before it is shown.

Does the contract have to be in writing, and how is the price set?

A contract may be made orally, in writing or in any other form, unless the law prescribes a mandatory form () [2]. In a dispute, however, the scope of work, the price and the deadline are easier to prove if they are written down.

If no fee or amount has been agreed, the usual fee is payable or, failing that, a fee that is reasonable in the circumstances () [7]. The contractor is presumed not to be entitled to charge for preparing the cost estimate () [7].

Can the contractor exceed the estimate?

An estimate may be binding or non-binding on the contractor; if nothing has been agreed on this, the estimate is presumed to be binding () [3]. According to the Supreme Court (Riigikohus), a contractor who claims that the estimate was non-binding must rebut this presumption and prove it (RK 3-2-1-72-15) [8].

If a non-binding estimate is substantially exceeded, the contractor may claim the extra fee if the excess could not have been foreseen. The contractor must notify the customer of the substantial excess without delay; if they fail to do so, they may claim the excess only to the extent that the customer has been unjustly enriched () [3]. If the customer terminates the contract because the estimate was exceeded, the customer does not have to pay the fee exceeding the estimate () [3].

With a binding estimate, the parties' agreements are interpreted to establish which works the estimate covered, because only works not covered by the original contract can be treated as additional works (RK 2-15-15662/55) [9].

When is payment due, and how is the work handed over?

The contractor's claim for the fee falls due when the work is completed () [7]. If acceptance of the work has been agreed or is usual, the fee falls due once the work has been accepted or is deemed accepted; where the work is handed over in parts and priced in parts, each part is paid for on its acceptance () [7]. The customer does not have to pay before having had the opportunity to inspect the thing, unless the agreed manner of delivery or terms of payment do not allow for this () [7].

The customer must accept finished work if handover was agreed or is usual given the nature of the work. The work is also deemed accepted if the customer, without good reason, does not accept it within a reasonable period set by the contractor () [10].

What if the work is defective?

The work must conform to the contract; where nothing has been agreed on its qualities, it must be fit for the particular purpose the customer needs it for and the contractor knew or should have known of when the contract was made, if the customer could reasonably rely on the contractor's professional skill or knowledge, and otherwise for the purposes for which work of that kind is usually used ( and lg 2 p 2) [11]. The contractor is liable for a non-conformity that existed when the risk passed to the customer, even if it becomes apparent only later () [12]. Where a consumer has ordered construction within the meaning of the Building Code from a business, a defect that becomes apparent within two years of handover is presumed to have existed at handover, unless this presumption is incompatible with the nature of the work or the defect; an agreement to the consumer's detriment is void () [12]. Under the Building Code (ehitusseadustik, EhS), construction includes „muu ehitisega seonduv tegevus, mille tulemusel ehitis tekib või muutuvad selle füüsikalised omadused“ [13] (translation: other activity relating to a building as a result of which the building comes into being or its physical properties change; ).

Notice. A defect must be reported within a reasonable time after the customer learned or should have learned of it; for a consumer contract for work, within two months () [4]. Under the Act, a consumer contract for work is one whose object is the provision of a service in respect of the consumer's movable property () [1]. Without timely notice the customer cannot rely on the defect; if the failure to notify is reasonably excusable, the customer may still reduce the fee or claim damages, except for lost profit () [4]. According to the Supreme Court, for hidden defects the reasonable time for notice does not start to run from the inspection of the work (RK 3-2-1-60-15) [14].

Repair. The customer may demand that the contractor repair the work or do new work, unless this would cause the contractor unreasonable costs or unjustified inconvenience () [5]. Outside consumer contracts for work, the customer loses this right if they do not demand repair together with the notice of the defect or within a reasonable time after giving it, unless the contractor's conduct is contrary to the principle of good faith ( and 7) [5]. If the customer justifiably demands repair and the contractor does not repair the work within a reasonable time, the customer may repair it or have it repaired and claim reimbursement of reasonable expenses () [5].

Other remedies. If repair is impossible or fails, or the contractor unjustifiably refuses it or does not carry it out within a reasonable time after being notified of the defect, the contract is deemed fundamentally breached and the customer may, without setting an additional period, among other things withdraw from the contract ( and 3) [15]. A customer who accepts defective performance may reduce the price by a declaration to the contractor ( and 2) [16], but not if the contractor has brought the work into conformity with the contract or done new work, or if the customer unjustifiably refused the contractor's offer to do so () [17].

How long do you have to make a claim?

The limitation period for a claim arising from a transaction is three years; for a claim under a contract for work arising from a defect in a building it is five years, and in the case of intentional breach ten years (, 2 and 4) [6]. TsÜS is the General Part of the Civil Code Act (tsiviilseadustiku üldosa seadus). The limitation period for a claim arising from a defect starts when the work is completed or, if the customer must accept the work, when it is accepted or deemed accepted () [18]. For a defect that has been remedied, the limitation period starts again from the remedy () [18]. The Supreme Court has held that a building design contract is also a contract for work to which the five-year limitation period applies (RK 2-16-14644/50) [19].

What the law says

  • „Sellise kokkuleppe puudumisel eeldatakse, et eelarve on siduv.“ [3] (translation: in the absence of such an agreement, the estimate is presumed to be binding; ) – unless a non-binding estimate was agreed, the contractor cannot later charge more for the works the estimate covers.
  • „Tellija ei pea töö eest tasuma enne, kui tal on olnud võimalus asi üle vaadata“ [7] (translation: the customer does not have to pay for the work before having had the opportunity to inspect the thing; ) – the chance to inspect comes before the final payment.
  • „Töövõtja kannab töö puuduse kõrvaldamise või uue töö tegemisega seotud kulud, eelkõige veo-, töö-, reisi- ja materjalikulud.“ [5] (translation: the contractor bears the costs of remedying a defect or doing new work, in particular transport, labour, travel and material costs; ) – repairing a defect costs the customer nothing.
  • „Ehitise puuduse tõttu töövõtulepingust tuleneva nõude aegumistähtaeg on viis aastat.“ [6] (translation: the limitation period for a claim under a contract for work arising from a defect in a building is five years; ) – building defects have a longer period than the general three years.

What to do

  1. Write down the scope of work, the price or estimate, whether it is binding, and the deadline (; ) [2] [3].
  2. If the contractor reports that the estimate will be substantially exceeded, decide whether to continue or terminate the contract ( and 3) [3].
  3. Inspect the work on handover and do not pay the final invoice until you have been able to do so () [7].
  4. Report the defect within a reasonable time, describe it and demand repair in the same notice (; ) [4] [5]. Keep the notice and photos.
  5. If no repair follows within a reasonable time, have the work repaired at the contractor's expense () [5], reduce the price () [16] or withdraw from the contract () [15].
  6. Keep track of the limitation period (; ) [6] [18].

Frequently asked questions

Can I terminate the contract before the work is finished?

Yes, the customer may terminate a contract for work at any time. The contractor is then entitled to the agreed fee less what they saved, or acquired or could reasonably have acquired by using their labour otherwise () [20]. This does not apply if you terminated the contract because the contractor breached it () [20].

Can the contractor charge for a quote?

The contractor is presumed not to be entitled to charge for preparing the cost estimate () [7]; the parties may agree otherwise.

Is the contractor liable if the defect came from materials I bought?

The contractor is not liable for a non-conformity resulting from the customer's instructions or from defects in materials the customer supplied, if the contractor checked the instructions and materials sufficiently () [11].

What happens if I do not accept the finished work?

If the customer, without good reason, does not accept finished work within a reasonable period set by the contractor, the work is deemed accepted () [10].

Is something different in your situation?

The guide describes the general rule. Ask about your situation: the answer cites the provisions down to the subsection and point and is checked against the sources before it is shown.

This guide gives general legal information and does not replace an attorney's advice on your situation. It was prepared with the help of an automated system; its quotes, figures and references were checked against the sources listed below.

Sources

The text in force on LegalWise's law pages; the official publication in Riigi Teataja.

  1. [1]VÕS § 635 (RT I, 20.06.2026, 18) – Võlaõigusseadus · Open provision
  2. [2]VÕS § 11 (RT I, 20.06.2026, 18) – Võlaõigusseadus · Open provision
  3. [3]VÕS § 639 (RT I, 20.06.2026, 18) – Võlaõigusseadus · Open provision
  4. [4]VÕS § 644 (RT I, 20.06.2026, 18) – Võlaõigusseadus · Open provision
  5. [5]VÕS § 646 (RT I, 20.06.2026, 18) – Võlaõigusseadus · Open provision
  6. [6]TsÜS § 146 (RT I, 31.12.2024, 48) – Tsiviilseadustiku üldosa seadus · Open provision
  7. [7]VÕS § 637 (RT I, 20.06.2026, 18) – Võlaõigusseadus · Open provision
  8. [8]Riigikohus 3-2-1-72-15 – Töövõtulepingu eelarve siduvus (17.06.2015) · Open decision ↗
  9. [9]Riigikohus 2-15-15662/55 – Siduv või mittesiduv eelarve (19.12.2017) · Open decision ↗
  10. [10]VÕS § 638 (RT I, 20.06.2026, 18) – Võlaõigusseadus · Open provision
  11. [11]VÕS § 641 (RT I, 20.06.2026, 18) – Võlaõigusseadus · Open provision
  12. [12]VÕS § 642 (RT I, 20.06.2026, 18) – Võlaõigusseadus · Open provision
  13. [13]EhS § 4 (RT I, 11.07.2026, 33) – Ehitusseadustik · Open provision
  14. [14]Riigikohus 3-2-1-60-15 – Töö lepingutingimustele mittevastavusest teavitamine (10.06.2015) · Open decision ↗
  15. [15]VÕS § 647 (RT I, 20.06.2026, 18) – Võlaõigusseadus · Open provision
  16. [16]VÕS § 112 (RT I, 20.06.2026, 18) – Võlaõigusseadus · Open provision
  17. [17]VÕS § 648 (RT I, 20.06.2026, 18) – Võlaõigusseadus · Open provision
  18. [18]VÕS § 651 (RT I, 20.06.2026, 18) – Võlaõigusseadus · Open provision
  19. [19]Riigikohus 2-16-14644/50 – Projekteerimislepingust tuleneva nõude aegumistähtaeg (25.03.2020) · Open decision ↗
  20. [20]VÕS § 655 (RT I, 20.06.2026, 18) – Võlaõigusseadus · Open provision

Related guides

  • Consumer credit and quick loans in EstoniaUnder the Law of Obligations Act (võlaõigusseadus, VÕS), when a business lends money or gives credit to a consumer, including a quick loan, it is a…
  • Buying a used car in EstoniaIf you buy a used car from a trader, it is a consumer sale under the Law of Obligations Act (võlaõigusseadus, VÕS) (VÕS § 208 lg 4): the seller is liable…
  • Defects and repairs in a rented flatUnder the Law of Obligations Act (võlaõigusseadus, VÕS), the landlord must hand over the flat in a condition suitable for use under the contract and keep…
  • Package holidays: your rightsUnder the Law of Obligations Act (võlaõigusseadus, VÕS), the organiser of a package travel (reisikorraldaja) is liable to the traveller for performance…

Is your situation different?

Describe your situation and get an answer based on the law in force, with exact references.

Ask your own question